"Freedom is not worth fighting for if it means no more than license for everyone to get as much as he can for himself." - Dorothy Canfield Fisher
Thursday, September 9, 2010
Montmorency's Revenge; The Protagonists
As I already mentioned on my previous blog post, some of the protagonists in my book are Montmorency, Frank (Lord Francis Fox-Selwyn), Inspector Howard, Dr. Robert Farcett, and Malpensa.
Montmorency: Because this is the fourth book in the series, there aren't any physical characteristics of Montmorency mentioned in the book. But looking at the cover, Montmorency is tall, has dark eyes and eyebrows, and is bearded. Many of Montmorency's qualities are shown in the book. First of all, Montmorency is very clever. Right after the whole family made a code for Tom's mother and Gus to use, Montmorency understood that he and Frank would need a code as well, and soon he and Frank came up with one. He is also quite secretive. Although he is Tom's father, he had not revealed that fact yet. ("It was clear they assumed Tom was George's son. Montmorency had still not admitted that Tom was his son, and , as ever, the time did not seem right." - p.9) Montmorency is confident and reasonable; without hesitating he told Frank that his idea was ridiculous, and he gave perfectly good reasons on why Frank should help Inspector Howard on the investigation. ("No, Frank. You're not. You look a bit strange ti's true. But you'll never be able to disguise yourself completely." - p.2) Lastly, Montmorency is caring. When water was flooding Dr. Farcett's room, Montmorency helped the most. ("He helped his friend lift his feet onto the sopping bathmat and tied the towel around his middle." - p. 10)
Frank: Frank has pale skin, freckles, and did have pale eyebrows and red hair. At the start of the book he shaves his head and his eyebrows so he would somehow look different, which would enable him to go after his uncle's murderers. ("...as he saw the bald head and then the clumps of ginger curls scattered about the floor." - p. 2) ("Look at your eyebrows. your pale lashes." - p.2) ("Your pale skin and your freckles would give you away at once." - p.2) ("He dipped the razor into the water and started scraping away at his eyebrows." - p.3) Frank also seemed quite mad with his new look. ("With no eyebrows, Frank seemed crazed and wild, his face round and puffy, coloring up with rage." - p.3) For his qualities, Frank is defensive, loyal, and quite stubborn. In chapter 1 he defended Tom when his father Gus was scolding him. ("Stop picking on Tom. Stop blaming him for everything, Dad. You're always criticizing Tom." - p.3) He shows his loyal and stubborn side when he is trying to convince his dad to let him take vengeance on Malpensa. He insists that he goes after Malpensa, and no matter how much his dad disagrees his will stays strong and in the end permission is granted.
Inspector Howard: There is not much physical description of Inspector Howard, except that he was a gentleman and he looked professional. ("Looks a professional sort of chap." - p.30) Inspector Howard is quite persuasive, and he is straight to the point. Along with Montmorency and Frank he convinced Gus (Frank's dad, the Duke of Monaburn) by presenting all the bright sides of the mission, and reminding Gus that the actual purpose of the mission is to protect the royal family, and not to take revenge on Malpensa. Twice Inspector Howard is very straight to the point when 1) he tells Gus that he cannot get mixed up with a private vendetta, 2) he tells Montmorency that he himself cannot provide any protection if they break the English law. * p. 40 & 54*
Dr. Robert Farcett: Dr. Farcett is an old man, and Montmorency described him as a 'pathetic figure'. Other than that there isn't much physical description. Dr. Farcett is quite obsessive; especially with hygiene. He takes forever to take showers and to wash his hands, claiming that 'they are not clean'. *p. 10 -13* Dr. Farcett is also quite mad. After his love Maggie Goudie died in Tarimond died, he lost his mind.
Malpensa: Malpensa is foreign (Italian to be exact). He has a bad leg which causes him to limp, and he is seen wrapped in a heavy cloak. He is clever and evil, since he is the head of the anarchists. Although he controls the movement and the plans of the anarchists, Frank says Malpensa doesn't have courage because he never does the dirty work himself. (p. 17) Much about Malpensa is still a mystery.
Thursday, September 2, 2010
Montmorency's Revenge; The Journey
First of all, I think I should explain the setting of the book I have chosen, Montmorency's Revenge. This book is the fourth book in the Montmorency Series which is set in the Victorian Era. So obviously the story is based in England. As the main characters there are Montmorency, Tom (Montmorency's son), the Duke of Monaburn Gus Fox-Selwyn, his sons Alexander and Frank, George the (deceased) twin brother of the Duke, Inspector Howard, Doctor Robert Farcett, and Malpensa. There are also other characters such as the wives and the servants including Harvey. In the previous books George Fox-Selwyn had been murdered by Malpensa, and Frank wishes to avenge his uncle's death. When Inspector Howard visits the Duke's castle, Frank's wishes are about to become true. The quote I choose is. 'There was a specific threat from Malpensa to target our royal family when they gathered for Queen Victoria's funeral ceremony' from page 18.
I chose this quote because it basically explains what journey this book is going to be about. Frank wanted to avenge his uncle's death although his father opposed it. When Inspector Howard comes, he tells the family that the Queen is very ill and that they are concerned about the royal family. Malpensa had been held responsbile for Uncle George's death, and it was also Malpensa whom sent the threat to the royal family. Since Frank had met Malpensa face-to-face in the past, Inspector Howard desires Frank's help in their investigation. I find this quote very important because it is where the two stories meet. Both Frank and Inspector Howard are after Malpensa, and with Montmorency's plan they can achieve their goal. So far I think this quote shows the journey the best because it explains for what purpose these people are working together, and what their quest is.
Wednesday, May 26, 2010
The Giver Week 4
Monday, May 24, 2010
The Giver Week 3
Peggy's Blog Post #1
First of all, you followed the criteria very well. It had at least three paragraphs, you displayed your thinking, and you answered one of the three questions with lots of detail and example. After reading your blog post I was able to clearly remember the discussion we had in our group a few weeks ago. I had answered the same question as you for my first blog post so it was easy for me to read your blog post as I was trying to compare yours with mine. Your response was similar to my answer. You talked about how it would be amazing to choose your own path for yourself but how it could be dangerous as well since you might make the wrong choices. You referred to information from the book often and you explained the advantages and disadvantages of having your future predetermined. I agreed with you when you said that a predetermined life would be boring and uninteresting. I also agreed with you with your conclusion saying that you would rather choose your future for yourself. Until I read the last paragraph I didn't really think that I gained any new insight from reading your blog post. However in your last paragraph you mentioned that humans would learn from mistakes. Although I have known this I hadn't really connected it with the idea of making mistakes by making the wrong choices for myself. Overall I really enjoyed reading your blog post. I think you have a lot of voice in your writing, and it is also very easy to understand the situation while reading your blog post because you give the background information. P.S. There's one spelling error :P.
Peggy's Blog Post #2
Once again, you've followed the guidlines - at least 3 paragraphs that shows that you're thinking with evidence from the book. I had answered the same question as you again so I could compare your thoughts with mine. I was familiar with some of the information you wrote down because I had thought so as well. I agreed with you about Jonas being disturbed about the rule 'You may lie' because all his life he had been told not to lie and now he is being told that he was allowed to lie. I also wrote about how Jonas was thinking what if everyone else in the community had received the rule of 'You may lie'. With what you had wrote on your blog post I had generally agreed with. One thing I probably didn't really agree with was the part where you said all lies can be hurtful. Of course most lies are hurtful, but in my opinion some lies are necessary. But I do get what you're trying to say. From reading youre second blog post I gained several new information. First of all, I learned about a white lie. To be honest I never really knew about white lies before. After reading your explanation about white lies, I thought a little about Jonas' parents. Could they feel hurt, or something like that if they learned that Jonas had lied? Anyway, I also thought about how I would feel if I was in Jonas' position. I've kind of thought about that before but not really properly. I learned that I would feel really depressed, irritated, and uncomfortable if I never knew if people were telling the truth or a lie. Actually it is already happening in this world because when you're dealing with other people you can't really truly know if they're telling the truth. If you're telling something only you know whether you're being honest or not. I have enjoyed reading your blog post again, as it had plenty of background information, evidence, and voice. Just watch out for those grammar/spelling mistakes.
Monday, May 17, 2010
The Giver Week 2
In a well structured 3 paragraph response (including evidence), choose one of the following three questions :
-1. When Jonas learns all about colors, he claims "it isn't fair that nothing has color". Why does he say this?
2. Why does Jonas find the instruction about lying so disturbing?
3. Why does The Giver say that making choices would be frightening for people?
The response is due Tuesday, 18th May.
Enjoy
Once again, I am going to start with a summary of what has happened so far. During the night of the Ceremony of Twelve Jonas had opened his folder which would contain the information he needed for the training. Jonas had found only one single page, and it had 8 instructions. There was instructions that surprised Jonas such as the one that mentioned that Jonas was allowed to lie and the one that said that he was exempted from rules about rudeness, that he was allowed to ask any kind of question to anyone in the community and that he would get the answer. The following day Jonas received his first memory, a very pleasant one with a sled ride on a hill with snow. Day after day that the Giver gave him many more pleasant memories, with only 'painful' memory which was the sunburn (not really that painful). One of the most important things that happened was the fact that Jonas learned about the concept of color. Although he couldn't keep the colors for more than about a second, he could see the different colors now such as red, green, and blue (before the power to see color had been mentioned as the power to see beyond, and yes so the everyone in the community cannot see color, except the Giver and Jonas). For a moment he thought that it was unfair that people couldn't make choices since they couldn't see color, but he quickly put the idea away because the Giver had suggested that it was dangerous if people made the wrong choices.
The question I have chosen to answer is #2. The question is - Why does Jonas find the instruction about lying so disturbing?. I think my main reason would be because Jonas had been raised that way. In the community that Jonas is living in you are not allowed to lie, you are always supposed to follow the rules, and you should always watch out for your language. Precision of language is taken very seriously in the community. Later in Chapter 16 he had learned about love and had asked his parents if they loved him, and they had replied him that love was the wrong word, and mentioned precision of language once again. Lying is taken even more seriously than precision of language. If you use the wrong word to describe something, you just have to fix your mistake. But lying is just forbidden. You just can't lie. It's forbidden. When you are raised up in Jonas' community you're so used to it that automatically you just don't lie. That was why Jonas was so surprised when he read that final instruction. All these years he was told not to lie, and now it said that he was actually allowed to lie. The reason it disturbed him so much was because he didn't want to lie. Another big thing that disturbed Jonas was the thought that in every other people's folders it said that they could lie as well. He felt frightened at the possibility of everyone already lying all the time.
Page 71 says a lot about what Jonas thinks of the instruction about lying. As I said in the previous paragraph he thought of the possibility that on every one's instruction folder it said 'You may lie'. After he thought more about it and elaborated on it, he thought maybe he could ask people such as his father, 'Do you lie?', but he knew that he would never know if the answer he received was true or not. Although it doesn't go much further than this in the book, after reading this part I thought what if everyone in the community did lie, just like Jonas said? During the discussion in our group, we briefly talked about the fact that the adults in the community all lie. The instructors in the school, etc. We discussed that in order to have the community running the instructors need to teach the students fake information. If we stretch this idea farther, it could be that every single person in the community who is twelve or older is allowed to lie. Overall, I think Jonas was disturbed because it was absolutely opposite to what he had been told in his childhood, and it had scared him to think that everyone in the community lied.
Tuesday, May 4, 2010
The Giver Week 1
1. Would you want your future to be decided by others ? Why or Why not?
2. How do you feel about the "standard practices" and "rituals" in the community?
3. Why is interdependence fostered in the community?
Guidelines for Blog Post - Minimum 3 paragraphs, include examples and evidence from the novel. Enjoy.
First of all, I should probably describe what is going on in the book. The Giver is a book about a imaginary future based utopian community. The book's main character is Jonas and the book revolves around in his point of view. In Jonas' community there are rules for about almost anything and if you do not obey the rules you get released (except for some rules that are lightly taken). Also when you are an infant and you get sick you get released, and when you're very old you get released as well. Besides that, until the age of twelve there is an annual ceremony for every age. There are ceremonies such as getting a ribbon, or getting your own bike. The most important ceremony is the Ceremony of Twelve and this is when you get assigned your job. In Jonas' community you do not get to choose your job. You also don't get to choose your family either. When you get old you are assigned your spouse, and you have to apply for your children (1 boy 1 girl). Yes, you are given your children, because there are birthmothers whose jobs are to give birth. Anyway there is a council who watches what you do until you turn twelve, and they try to make the best choice for you. When Jonas turns twelve, he is 'selected' to be the Receiver of Memory. The Receiver of Memory is very special because there is only one Receiver in the community. The Receiver of Memory is supposed to get special training from the former Receiver. This is what have happened so far in the book, and I chose to answer question number 1 for this blogpost.
1. Would you want your future to be decided by others ? Why or Why not?
I can answer this question quite easily. I would definitely not like to have my future decided by other people. My main reason is because if someone else decided my future for me it might be totally different to what I really want to do. They might give me a job that I have absolutely no interest in. And of course, leading into the choosing itself, it would be no fun if others just chose it for you. In my opinion we deserve to look at all the possiblities laying ahead of us and choose the one we want. If someone chose my future for me, especially in Jonas' community, I'd expect my life to be extremely boring because although you're living an every day life, you don't really have a life because you practically do the same thing every day and you have no passion for it. Also, your job is not the only thing that gets chosen for you in Jonas' community. Your spouse is assigned to you as well. You should have the freedom to marry the person you want and I know I would want that too instead of just being assigned a spouse matching my intelligence level etc.
I guess I'm actually more against living in Jonas' community than just having my future chose by others. Of course I still don't like the idea of being my future pre-determined since it means that I didn't choose it, and I might have no intention to live the kind of life that was chosen for me. However in addition to the pre-determined future and family units, there are a lot of features in Jonas' community that I dislike. First of all, I do not like the fact that they are given their assigned jobs at the age of twelve. In my opinion, you haven't really been able to enjoy your life yet. Well you could have had much fun when you were young, but can you really remember all that if it happened when you were young? You probably couldn't remember too much of it. They stop you before you start to really enjoy your life, and they give you a job. Also before you turn twelve (since Eight to be more exact) you have to do volunteer hours to fulfill the required amount. To be honest when I read this part I thought, how is it volunteer work if you HAVE to do it? Anyway, since we're getting a little off task, after you receive training and you have your job, you apply for a spouse and children. Honestly, what's the point of having a spouse if you don't love them and you barely have anything to do with them. Why not just have a center where babies are trained and taken care by some people and when they grow up just give them jobs? Also, people should have the choice to have children or not. This is where I come back to the reponse to the question. People should have the freedom to make choices for themselves.
Well, there are some bad things that might happen. Not all people are capable of making the right choices for them. They might make the wrong choices and very bad results might greet them. For example, if they choose a job that is not fit for them or if they choose not to have a job at all, they might end up losing everything they had or commiting suicide. Also if they choose the wrong person to marry they could go through very hard times making the both of them very unhappy and a possible divorce in the end. However, I think the risk is worth it. For every good thing there is always a bad side. Despite all the bad things that might occur because people can choose for themselves, I still think that it is right that people have the choice to choose and I would definitely choose my future for myself.
Thursday, March 4, 2010
The White Mountains Week 5
1. Write a prediction as to what will happen to the character(s) in the next book of the trilogy.
2. Write a letter to the character . Include any questions that you may want to ask the character, provide specific evidence from the novel.
3. Write a letter to the author. Information that could be included.. Where did the author get their ideas? What inspired them to write the novel? Questions that you may have?
4. Finally, chose one of the 3 main characters and write how this character has changed during the course of the novel.
Minimum requirements - 3 well structured paragraphs.
Enjoy Mrs.N
For 'The True Confessions of Charlotte Doyle' I wrote a letter to Captain Jaggery for my final blog post, this time I will be writing about how Henry's character changed throughout the novel. Both of my literature circle books have shown dramatic change in the characters. For my Charlotte Doyle book I had a chance to write about it but this time since I didn't, I'll do it now, as my final blog post for the White Mountains.
Although Will is the main 'main' character, I chose Henry as the character I would describe because he had had quite some change over the 10 chapters. First of all, in the introduction, Will had described him as taller and heavier, and he said that he and Henry hated each other (p5). So obviously I thought that Henry was mean even if it was only Will's point of view, and I also thought he wasn't the really nice type of guy when Will was going to see Jack and Henry was bullying Will. However things changed when Henry had heard Will sneak out and had followed him out. Despite the fact that Henry did pin Will down, he showed his softer side by saying that there was nothing left for him in Wherton, and he also ASKED Will if he could escape along with him. Although Henry didn't actually turn nice yet, it was the start of the change.
The fact that Henry's attitude toward Will changed showed clearly when Will had tripped and sprained his ankle. Henry had thought he had heard footsteps (they were actually sheep) and they were running when Will got injured. It was obvious that Will still didn't like Henry because he blamed Henry for mistaking sheep to human, and he accused him of abandoning him when Henry was actually getting food for them. This part showed that Henry could actually be nice to Will because after Will got injured, Henry took care of him. He stole the food for the both of them, and Henry waited patiently for Will's ankle to heal even if it would slow them down. In the result of Henry's act of kindness here, Will finally comes to the conclusion that he could trust Henry and Will tells Henry the rest of the story about the White Mountains, and he also shows him the map.
After Will and Henry arrived at France and met Beanpole, Henry's manners towards Will changed quite often. Now that there was a third member to the party, the boys started to take sides. It was pretty normal, because mostly when three people are friends or are together, two of them tend to stick together and usually one gets left out, and our group also discussed this. At first Henry was excluded from conversations Will and Beanpole, and when the situation changed, Henry began to be mean to Will once again because he wanted Beanpole all to himself. He often tried to go against Will, for example in page 91 Henry had chosen a bridge different from Will and Beanpole had agreed with Henry. But Henry's cruelty toward Will showed more when Henry suggested that they should leave Will behind at the castle of the red towers and that Henry and Beanpole should go ahead. Although Will was fond of the castle and was considering staying behind, Henry's suggestion disturbed him. Even after the three boys reunited, Henry was unfair to Will by saying that they should leave Will behind for sacrifice when they found out about the tracking device the Tripod had put in Will when it picked up Will. Both times Beanpole had declined the idea of leaving Will behind, but it plainly appeared that Henry wasn't fond of Will.
I don't exactly know what this concludes to, but I know that Henry's mind is pretty straight forward, and that he is also very sneaky. When he had followed Will out of the house he had been slightly nicer toward him. Also when Will wasn't able to travel for a few days he had looked after him but I'm guessing that he wasn't really showing what he really felt yet. He knew that he would have to gain Will's trust, so he didn't show that he still didn't like Will. But after they met Beanpole, Henry made it obvious that he disliked Will, well actually jealous. He did not hesitate to show it and some examples are when he kept on disagreeing with Will and thought about leaving Will behind. Well, I hope that analyzed pretty clearly how Henry's attitude changed throughout the book!